Asthma and tobacco: not to be shared with family and friends!

Over 160 years later, the paper in this issue of RESPIRATORY CARE by Mak et al2 adds to the evidence that exposure to tobacco smoke leads to adverse health effects. This study of a large sample of primarily teenagers in Hong Kong examined several variables, looking for additive associations of asthma symptoms. The authors found an increased probability of asthma symptoms occurring when exposed to tobacco smoke from heavy smokers, and having a parent and a best friend who smoke greatly place adolescents at risk. There are limitations to the generalizability of the results, mainly exposure to other air pollutants such as ozone (O3), particulate dust, and vapors that were not considered for this dense urban environment. Regardless, this study does point to the value for tobacco and air quality regulation. Currently, most states in the U.S.A. have bans on smoking in public areas. The most recent federal law The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Public Law 111–31, HR 1256), enacted June 22, 2009, is geared primarily to the protection of children and adolescents. This law gives the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco, specifically the manufacture, labeling, advertising, distribution, and sales. Oversight and enforcement powers are also delegated to the FDA. You may recall in 2010 the request for citizen input on cigarette packaging concerning images showing the very graphic and detrimental health effects of smoking tobacco. Nine graphic warnings were proposed in June 2011, and were to cover the entire top half of cigarette packs (front and back), and include the telephone number for a stop-smoking hotline, 800-QUITNOW. The images were to be on all cigarette packages by January 2013, but, unfortunately, Lorillard corporation and other cigarette makers filed a lawsuit arguing that the warnings relegate the companies’ brands to the bottom half of the cigarette packaging, which infringes on their right to free speech. This led to an injunction in November 2011, which temporarily blocked the packaging requirements. In February 2012, a United States district judge ruled that the mandate to put images on cigarette packaging violated the free speech amendment to the Constitution. The FDA appealed, and in April a federal appeals court weighed the constitutionality of requiring large graphic photographs. Now the tobacco companies argue that the warnings go beyond truthful information into anti-smoking advocacy. They contend that the photographs of dead and diseased smokers are not factual. No doubt many of us know the real truth in this matter. Just ask our chronic lung patients who are choking to death from active, passive, and third hand smoke. Fortunately, in July a federal appeals court upheld the order that tobacco companies are to place corrective advertising about the danger of smoking.